get_container
Retrieve detailed information about a container using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific container by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| container_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve detailed information about a container using its unique ID.
Get details of a specific container by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| container_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It only states 'Get details' with no disclosure of side effects, authentication, rate limits, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks structure. It could be expanded with minimal additional info without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and no description of return values. The description is incomplete for understanding tool behavior, especially given the ambiguous 'fields' parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and tool description adds no explanation for the 'fields' parameter or its allowed values. Meaning relies solely on parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (Get), resource (container), and identification method (by ID), distinguishing it from sibling get_container_by_name. However, it does not specify what 'details' entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_container_by_name or list_containers. Lacks any usage context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server