Skip to main content
Glama

pve_sdn_zone_get

Read the configuration of a specific SDN zone in Proxmox VE. Supports optional pending and running views for staged or applied settings.

Instructions

READ-ONLY: read one SDN zone's configuration (closes the pre-Wave-7a gap — only the zones LIST existed before). Use pve_sdn_zones_list to enumerate zone ids first.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zoneYesExisting SDN zone id to read.
pendingNoTrue nests staged-but-unapplied fields under a 'pending' key.
runningNoTrue returns the currently-APPLIED config instead of the default staged-merged view.
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Clearly indicates read-only nature; no annotations provided, but description carries burden well. Lacks mention of possible errors (e.g., zone not found) but output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with key info (READ-ONLY), no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present, description provides necessary context: use case, prerequisite listing tool, and read-only nature. Could add minimal guidance on pending vs running parameters, but schema covers those.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds minimal parameter info beyond what schema already provides; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States it reads one SDN zone's configuration, explicitly marks as READ-ONLY, and distinguishes itself from the list tool by noting the historical gap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use pve_sdn_zones_list first to enumerate zone ids, and the READ-ONLY label implies safe use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server