pmg_action_disclaimer_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description notes it is a mutation, dry-run by default, and what confirm=True returns. It mentions config requirements but does not describe the dry-run output format (covered in parameter description, not main). Without annotations, the description carries the burden; it covers core traits but could be more detailed on side effects or errors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with a 'MUTATION (LOW)' tag, then purpose, workflow, config, and confirm behavior. It avoids fluff and uses line breaks effectively. Could be slightly more compact but overall well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, 2 required, and an output schema, the description provides adequate context: purpose, typical workflow, config, and confirm behavior. However, it omits the dry-run output format in the main text (though present in the parameter description), which is a minor gap. Overall sufficiently complete for a create tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema; it provides workflow context but no new parameter-specific details beyond what is already in the parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'create a disclaimer action object in the PMG RuleDB' with a specific verb and resource. It is distinguishable from siblings like pmg_action_disclaimer_update by the action 'create', though it does not explicitly contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear workflow: list existing action objects with pmg_action_objects_list, create the disclaimer, then attach to a rule with pmg_ruledb_rule_action_attach. Also specifies the config requirement 'Needs PROXIMO_PMG_* config' and explains the confirm parameter behavior. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the workflow is informative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.