Skip to main content
Glama

pbs_node_cert_upload

Upload a custom TLS certificate to a Proxmox Backup Server node with a dry-run plan by default. Execute with confirm=True to apply; keys are never logged.

Instructions

MUTATION (HIGH, no undo): upload a custom TLS certificate to a PBS node. A malformed cert/key can lock you out of the PBS web UI and API. Dry-run by default.

PRIVATE KEY REDACTION: key is UNCONDITIONALLY redacted — never appears in the plan, change, detail, or ledger. Only {"key": "[redacted]"} is recorded. NOTE: PBS's own schema documents a 'restart' param on this endpoint as ignored ("UI compatibility parameter") — deliberately not exposed here.

confirm=True executes (POST /nodes/{node}/certificates/custom) and returns {"status": "ok", "result": [...cert info dicts...]}. Revert with pbs_node_cert_delete. Needs PROXIMO_PBS_* config.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyNoPEM-encoded TLS private key matching the certificate; a secret, unconditionally redacted in all output.
nodeNoPBS node name (or 'localhost').localhost
forceNoIf True, overwrite an existing custom certificate.
confirmNoFalse (default) returns a dry-run PLAN only; True executes the certificate upload.
certificatesYesPEM-encoded certificate chain (public, may appear in plans/logs).
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses the mutation nature (HIGH, no undo), dry-run default, unconditional key redaction, API endpoint and return format, and configuration requirements. This is comprehensive behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but includes essential warnings and context. It front-loads the mutation warning and is structured with clear sections. While not as terse as possible, it earns its length with valuable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity and dangerous nature, the description covers purpose, danger, dry-run, redaction, revert, config, and an ignored parameter. It is complete and leaves no critical gaps for a mutation tool with no annotations and an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions, so baseline is 3. The description adds context about the ignored 'restart' param and key redaction, but does not elaborate on other parameters beyond schema. Thus a 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool uploads a custom TLS certificate to a PBS node, using specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools by mentioning revert via pbs_node_cert_delete and also notes the dry-run default, which differentiates behavior from other node certificate tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use (dry-run default, confirm=True to execute), provides a warning about potential lockout, mentions a revert alternative (pbs_node_cert_delete), and notes an ignored parameter not exposed. This gives clear guidance on usage vs. alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server