Skip to main content
Glama

pve_node_hosts_set

Update /etc/hosts on a Proxmox node for hostname resolution. Captures current content to allow revert if needed; requires confirm=true to execute.

Instructions

MUTATION: replace the /etc/hosts file on a PVE node.

RISK_MEDIUM. CAPTURE: reads current /etc/hosts before planning (revert by re-applying captured content); if unreadable → complete=False. A bad /etc/hosts can break name resolution. confirm=True to execute.

POST /nodes/{node}/hosts Smoke-confirm: endpoint and body shape not live-verified.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
nodeNo
digestNo
confirmNo
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses risk level (RISK_MEDIUM), capture mechanism for revert, behavior when file is unreadable (complete=False), consequences of bad input, and confirmation requirement. No annotations present, so description fully carries the burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise and front-loaded with purpose. The 'Smoke-confirm' line adds minor context but is not essential. Overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers behavioral aspects well but lacks parameter guidance and usage context. Output schema exists but not mentioned. Adequate for a risky mutation tool without annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 20%, and the description adds little parameter-level detail. Only mentions 'confirm=True to execute' without explaining 'data', 'node', 'digest', or 'proximo_target'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Explicitly states verb 'replace' and resource '/etc/hosts file on a PVE node'. Clearly distinguishes as a mutation tool from its read counterpart pve_node_hosts_get among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for modifying hosts file but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. No mention of alternatives like pve_node_hosts_get.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server