Skip to main content
Glama

pve_sdn_fabric_nodes_list

List nodes belonging to a specific SDN fabric, with options to view pending or running configuration.

Instructions

READ-ONLY: list the nodes belonging to ONE SDN fabric.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pendingNoDisplay pending (staged, not-yet-applied) config.
runningNoDisplay the currently-APPLIED (running) config instead.
fabric_idYesExisting SDN fabric id whose nodes to list.
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description declares READ-ONLY, ensuring safety, but lacks details on permissions, side effects, or pagination; with no annotations, more transparency would be helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single sentence, front-loaded with READ-ONLY, with no unnecessary words; perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, description is nearly complete; it misses a mention of optional parameters (pending/running) but covers the core functionality.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema for parameters like pending, running, or proximo_target.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists nodes for ONE SDN fabric and is READ-ONLY, distinguishing it from siblings like pve_sdn_fabric_nodes_list_all.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for a specific fabric but does not explicitly contrast with alternatives (e.g., pve_sdn_fabric_nodes_list_all) or provide when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server