Skip to main content
Glama

pbs_group_change_owner

Reassign the owner of a PBS backup group. New owner gains control over deletion and prune. Use confirm=True to execute the change; dry-run by default.

Instructions

MUTATION (MEDIUM): reassign the owner of a PBS backup group. Dry-run by default.

The new owner controls deletion and prune of this backup group. The previous owner loses those permissions immediately. No PBS snapshot primitive — revert by re-assigning the owner back. confirm=True to execute.

PUT /admin/datastore/{store}/change-owner Smoke-confirm: exact path + new-owner vs owner param name.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nsNo
storeYes
confirmNo
backup_idYes
new_ownerYes
backup_typeYes
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses mutation nature, dry-run default, immediate loss of permissions, and reversibility. No annotations provided, so description carries the burden effectively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise at 7 lines, front-loads purpose and effects. Includes the HTTP path line, which is slightly extraneous but not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers key behavioral aspects (dry-run, effects, reversibility) and hints at API path. Missing permissions, side effects on backups, and clarification of backup_type/backup_id identifiers.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 14%, but description adds little to parameter meaning. Only 'confirm' and 'new_owner' get brief mentions; 'store', 'backup_type', 'backup_id', 'ns', and 'proximo_target' remain unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action ('reassign the owner') and the resource ('PBS backup group'). No sibling tool performs owner change, so it is distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains default dry-run and how to execute ('confirm=True'), and describes effects (new owner gains control, previous loses immediately). Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server