pmg_ruledb_rule_to_detach

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses mutation nature, dry-run behavior, effect condition (rule active), and API path. Does not mention reversibility or idempotency but is adequate for a detach operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise and informative, each sentence adds value. Could be slightly better structured but no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers operation, prerequisites, effect, and API path. Output schema exists, so return values not needed. Adequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (25%), but description explains the two required parameters (id_, ogroup) and mentions confirm. The proximo_target parameter is already described in the schema. Adds meaning beyond schema for the key parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'detach' and the resource 'to group from a PMG RuleDB rule'. It differentiates from siblings like pmg_ruledb_rule_to_attach by specifying the action and the object ('to' group).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context for usage: dry-run by default, confirm=True to execute, config needed. Implicitly contrasts with attach sibling. Could explicitly mention alternatives but the sibling names provide contrast.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.