pmg_domain_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It labels the tool as 'MUTATION (LOW)', describes dry-run by default, and states execution requires confirm=True. It also mentions required config. This provides sufficient behavioral insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with key information (mutation type, dry-run). Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and moderate complexity, the description covers the main purpose, parameters, and execution mode. It includes the API path and an example, making it fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 25%, and the description adds meaning for the 'domain' parameter with an example. It implies the role of 'confirm' but does not detail 'comment' or 'proximo_target'. The description partially compensates for low schema coverage but omits some param context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'create a managed mail domain' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like pmg_domain_delete or pmg_domains_list by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the dry-run behavior and that confirm=True is required to execute, giving clear context. It mentions the prerequisite config (PROXIMO_PMG_*), but does not explicitly exclude any cases or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.