Skip to main content
Glama

pve_firewall_ipset_create

Create an empty IP set referenced as '+name' in firewall rules. Dry-run by default; use confirm=True to execute.

Instructions

MUTATION: create an empty IP set. Dry-run by default — the PLAN shows the name and scope. Passive until a rule references it as '+name' and entries are added via pve_firewall_ipset_entry_add. Synchronous — confirm=True returns {"status": "ok", "result": None}; no task UPID to poll.

No UNDO: revert by deleting it with pve_firewall_ipset_delete.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNoGuest kind for scope='guest': 'qemu' or 'lxc'.
nameYesName for the new IP set, referenced by rules as '+name'.
nodeNoNode name, required for scope='guest'.
vmidNoGuest VMID/CTID, required for scope='guest'.
scopeNoFirewall scope: 'cluster' or 'guest' (no node-scope ipsets in the PVE API).cluster
commentNoFree-text comment stored with the IP set.
confirmNoSet True to execute the mutation; False (default) only returns a dry-run PLAN.
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses mutation, dry-run behavior, synchronous execution, confirm vs. dry-run return, passivity until referenced, and irreversibility. This is comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, no fluff. Front-loaded with 'MUTATION: create an empty IP set'. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's role in a workflow, the description explains the lifecycle (create, passive, add entries, use in rules, delete to undo) and return format. Complete for an experienced agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not add detail about parameters beyond what the schema already provides, but schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates an empty IP set and distinguishes itself from siblings like pve_firewall_ipset_delete and pve_firewall_ipset_entry_add. The verb 'create' and resource 'IP set' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains dry-run by default, when to use confirm=True, and how the set becomes active via rules and entries. It also notes no undo and suggests using delete to revert. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server