pve_acme_account_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool is a mutation, is additive, dry-runs by default, and explains the confirm parameter's effect (returns dry-run PLAN vs {'status':'ok'}). This is thorough, though it lacks details on error handling or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and informative, with a clear first sentence and subsequent detail. It is slightly verbose but every sentence adds value, covering purpose, usage, and behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters, 2 required, and an output schema, the description is fairly complete. It explains the dry-run behavior, the confirm parameter, and the workflow with other ACME tools. Minor gaps include error cases and prerequisites, but overall it provides sufficient context for usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add per-parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides. However, it does explain the confirm parameter's behavior and the overall workflow, which adds context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'register a new ACME account with the CA'. It also distinguishes from siblings by explicitly mentioning 'to remove an account instead use pve_acme_account_delete' and referencing other ACME tools for the full certificate issuance workflow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool and when to use alternatives. It instructs to pair with pve_acme_plugin_create etc. for certificate issuance, and to use pve_acme_account_delete for removal. It also explains the dry-run vs execution behavior via the confirm parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.