Skip to main content
Glama

pve_delete_guest

Permanently destroy a Proxmox guest and its disks, with dry-run planning to review cascade effects on backups, HA, and replication before confirmation.

Instructions

MUTATION (DESTRUCTIVE, IRREVERSIBLE): permanently destroy a guest and its disks. Dry-run by default — the PLAN names exactly what will be destroyed, including cascade effects on backup/ HA/replication references. confirm=True to execute. Async — returns the task UPID; poll with pve_task_status. No undo once confirmed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNoGuest type: `lxc` for a container or `qemu` for a VM.lxc
nodeNoPVE node the guest runs on. Omit to resolve it automatically from the cluster.
vmidYesNumeric ID of the guest to destroy — VMID for a QEMU VM or CTID for an LXC container.
forceNoForce removal even if the guest is still running or the backend reports an inconsistent state.
purgeNoIf true, also remove the guest from replication/backup jobs and HA resources referencing it.
confirmNoLeave `false` (default) to get a dry-run PLAN naming exactly what will be destroyed; set `true` to execute.
proximo_targetNoWhich configured Proxmox target to run this call against — a target name from your multi-target config (a specific PVE/PBS/PMG/PDM box). Omit to use the single/default target from the environment; the selection applies only to this call.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fully covers behavioral traits: it labels the tool as 'MUTATION (DESTRUCTIVE, IRREVERSIBLE)', explains the dry-run safety mechanism, async behavior with UPID return, and confirms no undo. It also notes cascade effects on backup/HA/replication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with the destructive nature, followed by the dry-run mechanism, async behavior, and final warning. Every sentence is necessary and contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity and the presence of an output schema, the description covers all essential aspects: destructive irreversible action, dry-run, confirm execution, async polling, and cascade effects. It is complete for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and all parameters have descriptions. The description does not add additional semantic value beyond the schema, such as detailed usage of force or purge. It mentions confirm in a behavioral context, but not parameter-specific details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'permanently destroy a guest and its disks.' It uses specific verb 'destroy' and resource 'guest', and it distinguishes from sibling tools like pve_guest_power (stop/start) or pve_clone (copy).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the dry-run default and the need to set confirm=True to execute, providing clear guidance on how to use the tool safely. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool versus alternatives like pve_guest_power or pve_snapshot_delete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john-broadway/proximo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server