pmg_quarantine_welcomelist_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses mutation type (LOW), dry-run vs execution behavior, no UNDO primitive (with re-add workaround), and describes exact return structures for both dry-run (PLAN) and execution ({"status": "ok", "result": ...}). Since no annotations are provided, the description fully covers behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using line breaks to separate key points without filler. Every sentence adds essential information, making it efficient for an AI to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, mutation with dry-run, no annotations, no output schema shown), the description covers purpose, usage, behavioral details, parameters, and alternatives. No gaps are evident for typical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). The description adds value by explaining pmail defaults to authenticated user and confirm triggers execution, but does not elaborate on proximo_target beyond the schema. This moderate addition warrants a slight bump above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool removes an address from the quarantine welcomelist, using strong verbs and specifying the resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like pmg_quarantine_welcomelist_add and pmg_quarantine_welcomelist_list by focusing on removal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly notes dry-run by default and confirm=True for execution, provides reference to pmg_quarantine_welcomelist_add as a re-add alternative, and mentions the PROXIMO_PMG_* config dependency, giving clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.