nexo_workflow_resume
Retrieve the next actionable step from a workflow run to continue execution.
Instructions
Summarize the next actionable step for a workflow run.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| run_id | Yes |
Retrieve the next actionable step from a workflow run to continue execution.
Summarize the next actionable step for a workflow run.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| run_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or whether it is read-only; the agent lacks critical info.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single front-loaded sentence, but it omits essential details; conciseness is achieved at the expense of completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and a parameter with zero description, the description is insufficient for an agent to confidently use the tool; it lacks context about output, prerequisites, and usage boundaries.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The sole parameter run_id lacks explanation in both schema and description; 0% schema description coverage means the description should compensate, but it does not explain what run_id is or how to obtain it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Summarize the next actionable step for a workflow run' clearly identifies the action (summarize) and the resource (next actionable step of a workflow run), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get or replay.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; no context about prerequisites or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wazionapps/nexo'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server