nexo_workflow_replay
Replay recent checkpoints of a workflow run for debugging or review.
Instructions
Replay recent checkpoints for a workflow run.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| run_id | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Replay recent checkpoints of a workflow run for debugging or review.
Replay recent checkpoints for a workflow run.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| run_id | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. 'Replay recent checkpoints' is vague and does not explain side effects, state changes, or safety, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with key information, with no redundant or extra text.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and parameter descriptions, the description is heavily under-specified. It does not explain return values, behavior of 'replay', or how parameters affect operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It does not mention the 'limit' parameter or clarify 'run_id' beyond the name, failing to add meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'replay' and resource 'checkpoints for a workflow run', clearly stating the tool's action. However, it does not differentiate this tool from similar siblings like nexo_checkpoint_read or nexo_workflow_resume.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor on prerequisites or context for invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wazionapps/nexo'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server