nexo_learning_delete
Delete a learning entry by its ID to remove it from cognitive memory.
Instructions
Delete a learning entry.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Learning ID number. |
Delete a learning entry by its ID to remove it from cognitive memory.
Delete a learning entry.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Learning ID number. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the action. It does not disclose whether deletion is permanent, if there are cascading effects, or any other behavioral traits beyond the basic operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single clear sentence that states the purpose concisely, but could include more context without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks behavioral context. Additional details on effects would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (id parameter described as 'Learning ID number'), and the description adds no extra meaning to parameters. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a learning entry.' provides a specific verb (Delete) and resource (learning entry), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like nexo_learning_add, nexo_learning_list, and nexo_learning_update.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., nexo_learning_update). There is no mention of prerequisites, consequences, or conditions for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wazionapps/nexo'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server