nexo_transcript_recent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It implies a read-only listing operation but omits details: whether it returns full transcripts or just metadata, any rate limits, authentication needs, or side effects. The description is too vague for an agent to predict behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence, which is concise but at the expense of necessary detail. It could be structured to front-load the core purpose and then elaborate on parameters. As is, it is too sparse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and three parameters, the description is highly incomplete. It fails to specify return format, filtering behavior, or how it relates to sibling tools. A more complete description is needed for reliable agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%; the description explains none of the three parameters (hours, limit, client). It mentions 'recent' but does not link it to the 'hours' parameter. Without any parameter explanation, the agent cannot correctly set inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the verb 'list' and the resource 'recent transcripts', and adds context 'visible to NEXO'. It implicitly distinguishes from siblings like 'nexo_transcript_read' (single transcript) and 'nexo_transcript_search' (search across transcripts). However, it could be clearer by explicitly differentiating.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., nexo_transcript_read, nexo_transcript_search). It does not mention any prerequisites or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.