nexo_reminder_restore

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only mentions restore to PENDING and token requirement. Lacks details on permissions, side effects, or what happens if reminder is not soft-deleted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no extraneous words. Critical precondition emphasized in all caps. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description does not explain return values or what 'restore' entails. Misses clarifying 'soft-deleted' concept. Incomplete for a standalone tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions. Description adds context about read_token origin from nexo_reminder_get, but does not provide additional meaning beyond schema for the id parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Restore a soft-deleted reminder back to PENDING' with a specific verb, resource, and target state. Distinguishes from siblings like nexo_reminder_delete and nexo_reminder_complete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call nexo_reminder_get first and pass its READ_TOKEN, providing a clear prerequisite. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the context implies it is only for soft-deleted reminders.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.