Skip to main content
Glama

nexo_followup_create

Create a self-managing follow-up task for an AI agent to verify or act on, with optional scheduling, recurrence, and priority.

Instructions

Create a new agent followup (autonomous task).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique ID starting with 'NF' (e.g., NF-MCP2).
descriptionYesWhat to verify/do.
dateNoTarget date YYYY-MM-DD (optional).
verificationNoHow to verify completion (optional).
reasoningNoWHY this followup exists — what decision/context led to it (optional).
recurrenceNoAuto-regenerate pattern (optional). Formats: 'weekly:monday', 'monthly:1', 'monthly:15', 'quarterly'. When completed, a new followup is auto-created with the next date. The completed one is archived with date suffix.
priorityNocritical, high, medium, low (default: medium).medium
internalNo'1'/'true' hides from default user views (agent bookkeeping, protocol, audit). Leave empty to auto-classify by ID prefix.
ownerNo'user' | 'waiting' | 'agent' | 'shared'. Leave empty for auto-classification.
exceptionNoReason this followup should be allowed even under an active autonomy mandate (NF-DS-45569A27). Valid only for the three pre-approved cases: >1GB download, credential the operator must physically enter, or a presence-dependent session with María/Nora.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'create' with no mention of side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or output nature. Minimal insight into tool behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence, no filler. Front-loaded with key action. However, brevity sacrifices context; a slightly longer description could be more helpful without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 10 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what a followup is, how it integrates into the workflow, or what happens after creation. Schema covers parameter details but overall context is lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and provides detailed descriptions for each parameter (e.g., id format, recurrence patterns). The general description adds no extra value beyond what the schema already conveys, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'create' and the resource 'agent followup (autonomous task)', distinguishing it from sibling followup tools. However, it does not explain what a followup is, requiring agent context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like nexo_followup_update or nexo_followup_complete. Lacks prerequisites or context for appropriate invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wazionapps/nexo'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server