list_groups
List active groups in InvGate Service Desk, optionally filtered by group ID or name.
Instructions
List active groups, or one in particular by ID or name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | No | ||
| name | No |
List active groups in InvGate Service Desk, optionally filtered by group ID or name.
List active groups, or one in particular by ID or name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | No | ||
| name | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden; only mentions 'active groups' but lacks details on read-only nature, side effects, or return behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no wasted words; adequately front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list tool, but lacks output format details and fails to explain behavior when both parameters are provided; with many siblings, more context would help.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds meaning by explaining that group_id and name are optional filters to retrieve a single group, which schema alone does not convey.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'List', resource 'active groups', and mentions optional filtering by ID or name, distinguishing it from sibling list tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like list_group_members or list_company_groups; context is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tracegazer/invgate-service-desk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server