get_user
Retrieve a single user record from InvGate Service Desk by providing the user ID. Optionally include disabled users.
Instructions
Get a single user by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | ||
| include_disabled | No |
Retrieve a single user record from InvGate Service Desk by providing the user ID. Optionally include disabled users.
Get a single user by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | ||
| include_disabled | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states it's a read operation. No additional behavioral details (e.g., error handling, permissions).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Low complexity tool, but lacks details on return value or error states. Adequate for a simple get, but not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description adds no parameter meaning. The parameters user_id and include_disabled are self-explanatory but description could clarify include_disabled's effect.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Purpose is clear: 'Get a single user by ID' uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling list and search tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines, when-to-use, or comparison to siblings like list_users or find_users.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tracegazer/invgate-service-desk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server