get_custom_field_list_options
Retrieve the options for a list-type custom field using its unique identifier.
Instructions
Get the options of a list-type custom field.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Retrieve the options for a list-type custom field using its unique identifier.
Get the options of a list-type custom field.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden, but it only states the action with no disclosure of read-only nature, permissions, or side effects. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence. However, it sacrifices helpful details that could fit without becoming verbose, balancing conciseness and completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without output schema, tool fails to describe return format or what 'options' means. For a simple tool, it may be sufficient, but it lacks context on expected output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and description omits any explanation of the required 'uid' parameter. Agent must rely solely on schema name, which is vague without context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool retrieves options for a list-type custom field, using specific verb-resource pairing. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_custom_field_tree_options or get_custom_field_config.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_custom_field_list_config. Agent must infer from context, but purpose is clear enough for basic usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tracegazer/invgate-service-desk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server