get_cis_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a read operation ('Get') but does not disclose behavioral traits beyond that. No annotations are present, so the description should cover aspects like authentication requirements, rate limits, or whether it returns partial results. It lacks such details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that conveys the core action without unnecessary words. It is appropriately front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has two required parameters and lacks an output schema, the description is minimally complete for a simple lookup but omits important context such as return structure, pagination, and error handling. It does not leverage the context signals to provide additional details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate. While it mentions 'internal IDs and inventory source ID', it does not explain the purpose of the two parameters (ci_source_id, ci_internal_ids) beyond their names, nor does it provide value constraints or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'CIs' along with the method (by internal IDs and inventory source ID). It distinguishes the tool from many siblings through its specific focus on CIs and IDs, though no explicit differentiation is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search or list tools. No context about prerequisites, filters, or limitations is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.