get_breaking_news
Retrieve a specific Breaking News announcement by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Get a single Breaking News announcement by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| breaking_news_id | Yes | ||
| date_format | No | iso8601 |
Retrieve a specific Breaking News announcement by providing its unique ID.
Get a single Breaking News announcement by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| breaking_news_id | Yes | ||
| date_format | No | iso8601 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only describes a read operation ('Get') but omits behavioral details such as error handling, rate limits, or what happens if the ID does not exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and 0% schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It does not describe the return value, error handling, or the role of date_format. Among many sibling tools, this description provides insufficient context for correct tool selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%; description does not explain the date_format parameter or its possible values. The phrase 'by ID' only hints at breaking_news_id. No additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get), the resource (Breaking News announcement), and the method (by ID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like list_breaking_news which retrieves multiple.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention that for listing all breaking news one should use list_breaking_news, or how to handle statuses.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tracegazer/invgate-service-desk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server