Skip to main content
Glama
sonisoft-cnanda

now-sdk-ext-mcp

Execute Subflow

execute_subflow

Execute a ServiceNow Flow Designer subflow by scoped name, supporting foreground (blocking) and background (async) modes. Pass input variables as key-value pairs for testing or automation.

Instructions

Execute a ServiceNow Flow Designer subflow by scoped name. Subflows are reusable building blocks in Flow Designer — this is the primary tool for testing subflows during development.

In foreground mode (default), the call blocks until the subflow completes and returns outputs directly. In background mode, it returns a context ID for polling with get_flow_context_status.

Pass inputs as key-value pairs matching the subflow's input variables.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
instanceNoThe ServiceNow instance auth alias to use. This is the alias configured via `now-sdk auth --add` (e.g., "myinstance", "prod", "test"). The user will typically refer to this by name when saying things like "on my myinstance instance". If not provided, falls back to the SN_AUTH_ALIAS environment variable.
scoped_nameYesScoped name of the flow/subflow/action to execute (e.g., "global.my_flow", "x_myapp_custom.create_incident_subflow").
inputsNoInput name-value pairs to pass to the flow/subflow/action. Keys are the input variable names defined in Flow Designer.
modeNoExecution mode. "foreground" (default) runs synchronously and returns outputs when complete. "background" returns immediately with a context ID — use get_flow_context_status to poll, then get_flow_outputs or get_flow_error to retrieve results. Use background for flows with approval/wait steps.
timeoutNoTimeout in milliseconds for the execution. Only applies to foreground mode. Default is the ServiceNow server default (~30s).
quickNoSkip creation of execution detail records for better performance. Default false. Use true in CI/CD or when you don't need step-level detail.
scopeNoScope context for script execution. Can be a scope name (e.g., "x_myapp_custom") or sys_id. Use when the flow is in a scoped app.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses key behavioral traits: blocking vs non-blocking modes, timeout applicability, quick flag for skipping detail records, and scope context. However, it lacks details on error handling or side effects beyond execution detail records.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is 4 sentences with clear structure: purpose, mode behavior, input format, and fallback. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy. Concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters and no output schema, the description sufficiently covers inputs and execution modes. However, it does not describe return value structure beyond 'returns outputs directly' in foreground, leaving some gap for agents needing detailed response handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds meaningful context for parameters: explains inputs as key-value pairs, quick flag usage for CI/CD, instance fallback, scope usage, and mode polling workflow. This goes beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Execute' and the resource 'ServiceNow Flow Designer subflow by scoped name', and explicitly distinguishes it as 'the primary tool for testing subflows during development', differentiating it from sibling tools like execute_flow and execute_action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use foreground vs background mode, including blocking behavior and polling workflow. Suggests background for flows with approval/wait steps. Clearly differentiates from siblings by focusing on subflows.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sonisoft-cnanda/now-sdk-ext-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server