Create project
create_projectCreates a project in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus via sdp-mcp, letting LLM agents add project records through its v3 REST API.
Instructions
Create a project.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | Yes |
create_projectCreates a project in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus via sdp-mcp, letting LLM agents add project records through its v3 REST API.
Create a project.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v2.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It says nothing about required permissions, side effects, validation rules, or what the body object should contain, leaving the agent with no operational context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It is short and front-loaded, but the one sentence is pure tautology and does not earn its place by conveying any useful information about the operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the nested body object, absent annotations, and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate for an agent to invoke this tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single body parameter is a nested object with no schema description or defined properties (0% coverage). The description adds no information about its expected structure or contents.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description restates the tool name and title verbatim, giving no additional detail about what kind of project is created or how it differs from sibling tools like create_request, create_change, or create_task.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_request or create_change, nor any prerequisite or context information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.