remnawave_users_enable

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only says 'mutation' but fails to disclose behavioral traits: what enabling a user entails (e.g., changes to status, traffic, subscription), required permissions, side effects, or any safety concerns. Agent cannot infer consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short but not concise in a useful way. Lacks structure; every sentence should earn its place. This is an under-specified label, not a functional description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero annotations, no output schema, 4 undocumented params, and a large sibling set, the description fails to provide sufficient context for safe and correct tool invocation. Essential information about payload structure and effects is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage. The description adds no meaning beyond schema structure. Payload is a generic object with no documented fields; confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved are unexplained. Agent cannot determine correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description is nearly a tautology: 'Remnawave users.enable (mutation).' It restates the tool name and indicates it's a mutation but provides no specific verb or resource distinction. Fails to differentiate from siblings like remnawave_users_disable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No context about prerequisites, filtering, or when not to use it. Among many user-related tools, the agent has no basis for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.