remnawave_subscriptions_get_connection_keys_by_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The '(sensitive-read)' tag hints at a read operation accessing sensitive data, but no details are given about side effects, authentication needs, or data sensitivity. With no annotations, the description should provide more behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While very concise, the description is too minimal to be helpful. It does not earn its place because it adds no substantive information beyond the name. A good description would be longer and more informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has four parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is gravely incomplete. It does not explain the function, expected input, or return value, leaving the agent unable to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention any of the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to explain what these parameters mean or how to use them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially a restatement of the tool name, adding only '(sensitive-read)'. It does not clarify what 'connection keys' are or the tool's specific action beyond the implicit 'get' from the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling subscription tools. There is no information about prerequisites, alternatives, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.