remnawave_subscription_settings_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description only labels it as a mutation, implying it changes data, but lacks details on what changes, required permissions, side effects, or return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence), but it is under-specified and fails to convey useful information. Conciseness without substance is not effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, high parameter count (4), nested objects, and many sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. It does not help the agent understand the tool's role or how to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description provides no information about the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The schema itself lacks descriptions, so the agent has no guidance on parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says "subscription_settings.update (mutation)", which indicates a mutation to update subscription settings. However, it doesn't specify what subscription settings are or what exactly gets updated, leaving ambiguity. It's slightly more than a tautology but still vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include 'remnawave_subscription_settings_get' and many subscription-related tools, but no when-to-use or when-not instructions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.