remnawave_users_bulk_all_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden. It only labels the operation as a mutation but does not disclose that it updates all users, requires a confirmation token, or the implications of the payload parameter. Critical behavioral traits are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It does not earn its place because it provides no useful information beyond a repeat of the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 parameters including a nested payload, no output schema, and no annotations), the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain the tool's purpose, parameters, or effects, leaving the agent unable to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no information about any parameter. The payload, confirmToken, responseMode, and mutationApproved parameters are not explained at all, leaving the agent without meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remnawave users.bulk_all_update (mutation)' repeats the tool name and adds the term 'mutation', but does not specify what the tool actually updates, the scope ('all users' is implied by name), or how it differs from similar sibling tools like 'remnawave_users_bulk_update'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or the role of parameters like confirmToken or mutationApproved. The description offers no usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.