remnawave_nodes_bulk_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only labels the operation as a 'mutation' but fails to explain side effects, whether it requires a confirmation token, or how the payload is processed. This is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While the description is short (one sentence), it sacrifices essential detail. True conciseness would provide clear, necessary information without fluff; here it lacks substance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no parameter descriptions, and a complex nested payload, the description is entirely inadequate. It does not explain how to construct a request or interpret the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the purpose of any parameter, particularly the 'payload' object, which is critical. No guidance on structure or required fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description is extremely brief: 'Remnawave nodes.bulk_update (mutation).' It barely indicates it's a mutation for bulk updating nodes, but does not specify what 'bulk' entails or differentiate it clearly from siblings like remnawave_nodes_update. The purpose is vague and provides little actionable clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. There is no mention of when to use this tool over alternatives like remnawave_nodes_update (single node) or remnawave_nodes_bulk_actions. The agent is left without context to decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.