remnawave_nodes_profile_modification

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only labels the tool as a 'mutation' but provides no details on side effects, required permissions, or the confirmation mechanism hinted by confirmToken and mutationApproved parameters. With no annotations, the description carries full burden and fails to disclose behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While the description is short (one sentence), it is a case of under-specification rather than conciseness. It lacks crucial information and does not earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 parameters including a nested object, no output schema, no annotations), the description is completely inadequate. It fails to provide any useful context for an AI agent to select or invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain any of the 4 parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). With schema description coverage at 0%, the description must compensate but offers no information on parameter meaning or usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remnawave nodes.profile_modification (mutation).' is essentially a tautology, restating the tool name without clarifying what the tool modifies about node profiles. It fails to distinguish from sibling tools like remnawave_nodes_update or remnawave_profiles_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as nodes update or profiles update. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.