remnawave_subscription_page_configs_clone

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description labels the operation as a 'mutation' but offers no further disclosure about side effects, required permissions, or what gets cloned. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, but it fails to specify behavioral traits beyond the label.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise but at the expense of informativeness. It is a single sentence that adds minimal value, lacking necessary details. True conciseness would include essential information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, a complex payload, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to provide enough information for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The payload is a complex object with no guidance, and the other parameters' semantics are entirely undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it is a clone operation on subscription page configs, identifying the specific action and resource. However, it does not explain what 'clone' entails (e.g., duplicating an existing config, creating a new config based on a template), which is vague and barely distinct from sibling tools like 'create'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, typical use cases, or when not to use it, leaving the agent without context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.