remnawave_subscription_settings_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes the word 'read' implying no side effects, but with no annotations, the description should disclose more behavioral details. It does not mention whether authentication is required, rate limits, or any other behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line) but at the expense of necessary detail. It is under-specification rather than efficient conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given four parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is entirely inadequate. It provides no information about return values, parameter usage, or the nature of subscription settings, leaving a significant gap for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to any of the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The schema itself lacks descriptions; the description does not compensate, leaving an agent with no guidance on how to fill the input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool retrieves subscription settings (subscription_settings.get) and notes it is a read operation, but does not specify what constitutes subscription settings or differentiate it from other 'get' tools for subscription or other resources. The name is clearer than the description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling tool 'remnawave_subscription_settings_update' or other subscription-related get tools. The description does not mention prerequisites or context of use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.