remnawave_subscriptions_get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description only adds 'sensitive-read', which hints at permissions but does not disclose concrete behavior (e.g., whether it is idempotent, what happens if config doesn't exist). The burden is on the description, and it falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (18 words), but brevity does not compensate for lack of substance. It is not well-structured for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description fails to provide sufficient context. The agent lacks understanding of the tool's purpose, inputs, and expected output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description provides zero explanation of any of the 4 parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The agent cannot infer how to use them correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description repeats the tool name and adds '(sensitive-read)' but does not clarify what a 'subpage config' is or what the tool retrieves. It is marginally better than a tautology but still vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. siblings like get_by_short_uuid, get_raw_by_short_uuid, or other subscription config tools. The agent is left to guess the distinction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.