remnawave_subscription_page_configs_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only indicates it is a mutation, which implies modifications occur. No annotations are provided, and the description does not elaborate on behavioral traits such as prerequisites, side effects, or required permissions. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line), which could be considered concise, but it is under-specified to the point of being uninformative. It does not earn its place as it provides almost no useful information beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is completely inadequate. It leaves the agent without essential information about what the payload should contain, the purpose of confirmToken, responseMode options, or mutation approval logic.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention any of the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). It adds no meaning beyond what the schema provides, failing to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'update (mutation)' which clearly indicates the tool performs an update operation on subscription page configs, providing a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like create, delete, clone, or reorder, so it is not a perfect 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are many sibling tools for subscription page configs (create, delete, clone, reorder), but the description offers no context on when an update is appropriate or how it differs from those.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.