remnawave_nodes_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'mutation', but does not describe side effects, permissions required, idempotency, or return behavior. This is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one short sentence), but it sacrifices clarity and completeness. While efficient, it does not earn its place because it omits essential information that the agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, nested object, enum, no output schema), the description is wholly inadequate. It does not explain the payload structure, the purpose of confirmToken, or the effect of mutationApproved, making it impossible for an agent to use correctly without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds zero parameter information. The four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved) are completely undocumented in the description, leaving the agent without guidance on how to use them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remnawave nodes.update (mutation)' indicates the tool updates nodes and is a mutation, which is more than a tautology. However, it lacks specificity about what a node is or what updating entails, and does not clearly distinguish it from sibling tools like create or delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Neither prerequisites, nor conditions for use, nor exclusions are provided. The label '(mutation)' hints that it's a write operation, but that's insufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.