remnawave_subscriptions_get_by_short_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It adds "sensitive-read" suggesting sensitivity and read-only nature, but does not disclose required permissions, rate limits, or what exactly is sensitive (e.g., user data exposure). The behavioral traits are insufficiently described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks necessary detail, making it unhelpful for an AI agent. Front-loading is irrelevant because there is almost no content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, 4 undocumented parameters, no annotations, and a complex context with many sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to provide sufficient information for correct tool selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no parameter descriptions. The description also fails to explain any of the 4 parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The agent has no way to know what each parameter does or what values to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states "subscriptions.get_by_short_uuid" which implies retrieving a subscription by short UUID, but it doesn't explicitly state what information is returned. The parenthetical "sensitive-read" adds some context but is still vague. It distinguishes from siblings like get_by_username or get_by_uuid by identifier, but lacks detailed purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Siblings include other subscription retrieval methods (by username, UUID, raw, subpage config), but the description provides no comparison or usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.