remnawave_subscription_page_configs_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description minimally states it's a read operation, implying no state changes. However, it fails to describe any other behavioral traits such as required permissions, return format, or side effects. The term 'read' is the only transparency provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence), but it is under-specified. For a tool with four parameters and no schema descriptions, it lacks essential information to be considered concise yet complete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, no annotations, and no parameter explanations. Given the complexity of the sibling toolset and the tool's own parameters, the description is insufficient for an agent to understand how to correctly invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the four parameters (payload, confirmToken, responseMode, mutationApproved). The agent receives no semantic help beyond the schema field names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description indicates it is a read operation for subscription page configs, which is clear but minimal. It essentially restates the name with '(read)', providing basic purpose but lacking specific detail like what is retrieved or how it differs from list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives like list, create, update, or delete. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.