remnawave_users_bulk_all_extend_expiration_date

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only says '(mutation).' It fails to disclose behavioral traits such as what gets modified, required authorizations, side effects, or confirmation steps. The description carries the full burden but adds no value beyond the label.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but under-specified. It is not concise in the sense of efficient communication; it merely restates the name. A helpful description would be longer but more informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, high parameter count, and no annotations, the description should provide comprehensive context. It fails to explain the tool's purpose, how to use the parameters, or what the mutation entails. The description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters with no descriptions (schema coverage 0%), and the tool description does not explain any parameter meaning. For example, 'payload' likely contains extension details but is not clarified. The description adds no semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name as 'Remnawave users.bulk_all_extend_expiration_date (mutation).' It does not specify what the tool does, just that it's a mutation. This is a tautology and provides no purpose clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools like 'remnawave_users_bulk_extend_expiration_date' exist but no differentiation or usage context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.