Set Publish Settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate it's a non-read-only mutation with open-world hint, but the description adds no further behavioral context. It does not disclose required permissions, side effects of publishing as template, or whether changes are reversible. The agent lacks crucial safety information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence. It is not verbose but adequately conveys the tool's purpose. Could be slightly more structured with bullet points for key behaviors, but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters and an output schema, the description is too minimal. It fails to explain the effect of each setting, return value, or any dependencies. A more thorough description would improve usability.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%—each parameter has a description. The tool description does not add any additional meaning or context beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it updates publish settings of a form, which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'batch_update_form' that may update other properties. However, it could be more specific by mentioning the exact settings (template, authentication) to further differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'batch_update_form' or 'update_drive_file'. The agent is given no context about prerequisites or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.