Manage Spreadsheet Comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate mutating (readOnlyHint=false) and open-world effects. The description adds context: actions are cell-scoped via Drive API, cannot anchor to arbitrary text. This clarifies behavior beyond annotations, though it does not detail side effects like notifications or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: title, then bulleted actions with requirements. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy. Ideal length for quick parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters, 3 actions, and existing output schema, the description covers actions and key parameter constraints. It mentions the cell-scoped limitation. It doesn't explain return value (output schema handles that) or error handling, but is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must explain parameters. It explains action, comment_content, and comment_id with required conditions, but user_google_email and spreadsheet_id are not described. While spreadsheet_id may be obvious, the description could be more thorough.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it manages comments on a Google Spreadsheet with three specific actions (create, reply, resolve). It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_spreadsheet_comments (listing) and manage_document_comment (for Docs), making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for managing comments but does not explicitly compare to alternatives (e.g., list_spreadsheet_comments for reading, or other sheet tools). It lacks guidance on when not to use or prerequisites, relying on inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.