Skip to main content
Glama

Manage Doc Tab

manage_doc_tab
Destructive

Create, rename, delete, or populate document tabs with Markdown content in Google Docs.

Instructions

Manage document tabs: create, rename, delete, or populate from Markdown.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
user_google_emailYesUser's Google email address
document_idYesID of the document
actionYesAction to perform - "create", "rename", "delete", or "populate_from_markdown"
tab_idNoTab ID (required for rename, delete, populate_from_markdown; use inspect_doc_structure to find IDs)
titleNoTab title (required for create; used by rename)
indexNoPosition index for new tab, 0-based among siblings (required for create)
parent_tab_idNoOptional parent tab ID to nest under (create only)
markdown_textNoMarkdown source to render (populate_from_markdown only)
replace_existingNoClear tab body before inserting markdown (default True)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true. The description adds the 'populate from Markdown' action but does not disclose other behavioral aspects like reversibility or required permissions. Some additional context is provided but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the key action and lists specific behaviors. It is concise and wastes no words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 9 parameters and 4 actions, the description is too brief. It does not explain return values, prerequisites (like using inspect_doc_structure for tab_id), or overall process. The output schema exists but is not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'manage' and specific actions (create, rename, delete, populate_from_markdown) on 'document tabs', distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_doc or get_doc_content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention when not to use it. It only lists actions without contextual usage conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chadvdwww-hash/worksuite-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server