list_blocks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no new behavioral context (e.g., pagination, performance, or idempotency). It does not contradict the annotations, but the description is minimal beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, front-loading the core action. It is appropriately sized for a simple list operation, but could be slightly more informative without adding much length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no mention of what is returned (e.g., block IDs or full objects) or any limitations (e.g., maximum block count), the description is incomplete. For a list tool, the return structure is important context that is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema describes surveyId as 'The Qualtrics survey ID' with 100% coverage. The description 'List all blocks in a survey' reinforces that surveyId identifies the survey, adding no additional semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'List' and resource 'all blocks in a survey', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_block' (retrieves a single block) and 'create_block' (creates a block). It states exactly what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to list all blocks, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like 'get_block' for a specific block. No exclusion criteria or usage context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.