insert_flow_element

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=false, which aligns with an insert operation. The description adds that a FlowID is auto-generated if not supplied, but does not disclose other potential side effects (e.g., impact on survey flow logic) or permissions required. Some behavioral insight is provided but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two sentences. The first covers the core purpose and the second adds a key behavior. No redundant or extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having no output schema, the description does not mention what the tool returns (e.g., the created element with assigned FlowID). It also lacks details on validation of the element structure. Given the complexity of the nested object parameter, more context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds value by explaining the 'exact position' concept and the auto-generation of a collision-free FlowID. This enhances understanding beyond the schema's property descriptions, particularly for the 'element' and 'placement' parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Insert'), the resource ('any Qualtrics flow element'), and the scope ('at an exact position'). It lists specific element types and mentions automatic FlowID allocation, distinguishing it from sibling tools like update_flow_element and delete_flow_element.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for adding new flow elements, but does not explicitly compare with alternatives (e.g., update_flow_element, move_flow_element) or specify prerequisites such as survey state. It provides basic context but no when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.