appflowy_update_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Update', implying mutation, but omits details on idempotency, authorization requirements, side effects, or what happens to unspecified fields. The description is too bare to guide safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and front-loaded, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It conveys the basic purpose without elaboration, which is adequate but not optimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 required parameters, nested object, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It does not explain the update behavior, response format, required permissions, or how to use defaults. More detail is needed for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate. It lists 'name, icon, color, or permission' but does not map precisely to schema fields (e.g., 'color' is 'space_icon_color', 'permission' is 'space_permission'), nor does it explain that 'name' is required or that defaults exist for other fields. The nested structure is not clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a space and lists the attributes (name, icon, color, permission). It uses a specific verb and resource, and 'update' distinguishes it from creation tools like appflowy_create_space. However, it says 'or' which could imply optionality, but the schema requires 'name' inside the request object.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like appflowy_update_workspace or appflowy_create_space. No prerequisites, context, or conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.