appflowy_restore_page_from_trash
Restore a deleted page from trash by providing the workspace ID and page ID.
Instructions
Restore a page from trash.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| page_id | Yes |
Restore a deleted page from trash by providing the workspace ID and page ID.
Restore a page from trash.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| page_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the action without disclosing behavior such as error conditions, permissions, or side effects. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is succinct and to the point. However, lacks structural elements like parameter descriptions or additional context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple restore operation but missing details on edge cases (e.g., page not in trash), return values, or prerequisites. No output schema or annotations to supplement.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Parameters 'workspace_id' and 'page_id' have no descriptions in the schema or in the tool description. Schema coverage is 0%, so the description adds no value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly specifies verb 'Restore' and resource 'page from trash'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like 'delete_page_from_trash' and 'move_page_to_trash'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as when to restore vs permanently delete. The description lacks context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/weironz/appflowy_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server