appflowy_delete_chat
Delete a specific AI chat from a workspace using workspace ID and chat ID.
Instructions
Delete an AI chat.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| chat_id | Yes |
Delete a specific AI chat from a workspace using workspace ID and chat ID.
Delete an AI chat.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | ||
| chat_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose whether deletion is permanent, reversible, or if there are any side effects like cascading deletes. For a destructive operation, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence), but it lacks essential details. Conciseness should not come at the expense of completeness; here, it is under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, no parameter descriptions, and no behavioral notes, the description is critically incomplete. An agent cannot determine return values, error cases, or the full impact of calling this tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% (no descriptions in input schema). The description does not explain what 'workspace_id' or 'chat_id' represent, leaving the agent with no semantic guidance beyond parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete an AI chat' clearly states the action and resource, but is somewhat tautological as it largely repeats the tool name. Among siblings, it is sufficiently distinct from other delete tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., deleting a page or workspace). No context about prerequisites or side effects.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/weironz/appflowy_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server