再生停止

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses critical behaviors: scene reconstruction causing all entity IDs to change, sceneGeneration increment, synchronous return of mode and sceneGeneration. Annotations only provide openWorldHint=false, so the description adds substantial value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences: first states main action, second details return value and processing, third explains behavioral implications and after-use guidance. Well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters) and presence of output schema, the description fully covers the tool's purpose, behavior, return value, and post-call instructions. No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters (0), so no parameter explanation is needed. The baseline for zero parameters is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool switches from Playing to Editor mode and restores the snapshot before playback. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like dx12_play by specifying the reversal action and noting that entity IDs change.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear post-call guidance: do not use old entity IDs, suggests re-fetching with dx12_list_entities or using name parameters. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.