update_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds 'Modifies an existing record in place. Idempotent.' which aligns but does not provide additional behavioral details beyond annotations. No mention of auth requirements or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains redundancy: 'Update a task' and 'Update an existing task' are repetitive. The first line with emoji and HTTP method is useful, but the overall structure could be more concise. It is not optimally front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the nested input schema and no output schema, the description provides adequate context for a simple update operation. However, it does not clarify that the body is optional or that only provided fields are updated. Sibling tools like create_task and get_task provide contrast.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all parameters. The tool description does not add extra meaning beyond what is already in the schema (e.g., it doesn't summarize or clarify the optionality of the body). Baseline 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a task' and specifies it applies to 'Deal Tasks' with HTTP method PUT. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_task, delete_task, and other update tools (e.g., update_a_deal_note). The verb 'update' and resource 'task' are explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for modifying existing tasks but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives. However, the resource type 'Deal Tasks' and the operation 'update' provide clear context. No exclusions or when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.